Template:Did you know nominations/The Machine Question
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 20:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Machine Question
[edit]- ... that in The Machine Question, David Gunkel argued that the other minds problem implies that a proper understanding of consciousness is impossible?
- Reviewed: Taiyuan Metro
- Comment: This article was moved to mainspace with this edit four days ago. SilverserenC 01:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Created by Silver seren (talk). Self nominated at 01:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC).
Length and history verified; ref accepted in good faith since the webpage returns an internal server error. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Addendum: Found some links and removed orphan tag. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Only one link is not working,[1] but the editor has linked to doi. Some of the quotes at Critical reception are too big and should be shortened. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- need to know if these have been sorted out and give it another look over. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- I have notified the nominator. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Addendum: Found some links and removed orphan tag. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case:, @OccultZone:, @Panyd:, I have fixed the one ref link, it should be working properly now. But I disagree on the Critical Reception quote lengths. And that has nothing to do with the DYK review process anyways (since you're not supposed to include quotes in word count as it is). SilverserenC 21:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would still ask you to rewrite some of them in your words. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- @OccultZone: Okay, i've rewritten two of them. Is that good enough? SilverserenC 16:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- I would still ask you to rewrite some of them in your words. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case:, @OccultZone:, @Panyd:, I have fixed the one ref link, it should be working properly now. But I disagree on the Critical Reception quote lengths. And that has nothing to do with the DYK review process anyways (since you're not supposed to include quotes in word count as it is). SilverserenC 21:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Good to go now.
OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)