Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/The Right Stuff (blog) 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The Right Stuff (blog)

[edit]
  • Reviewed: QPQ not required due to fewer than five DYK credits.
  • Comment: Article was previously merged and redirected; was completely rewritten by me with minor reuse of old content and more than 1500 characters of new, original prose. The WordsmithTalk to me 01:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Converted from a redirect by The Wordsmith (talk). Self-nominated at 01:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

 • Some issues found.

    • This article is new and was created on 18:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 3404 characters
    • Paragraphs [7] ("The ... Zionism.") in this article lack a citation.
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 26.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 80 characters
    • The Wordsmith has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 4 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 02:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Looks good on all basic criterion. The missing cite noted above is simply a stub lead-in to a quote that is correctly cited. Read some of the articles pointed to by the copyvio tester and while they are all similar to each other, this article is not a scrape of them. Good to go! Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)