Template:Did you know nominations/Tito–Stalin split
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tito–Stalin split
- ... that the Cominform Resolution of 28 June 1948 publicly announced the Tito–Stalin split? Source: Perović, Jeronim (2007). "The Tito–Stalin split: a reassessment in light of new evidence" pp. 58–61 ([1])
Improved to Good Article status by Tomobe03 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC).
Article is long enough (28265 characters), is a GA, nominated in time (became GA on 17 December, nominated 19 December), and article is within policy. There is one citation needed tag, but this shouldn't stop the DYK nomination from progressing- Hook is short enough, well-cited, in the article, and neutral POV
- QPQ done
Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Please provide an inline cite for the hook fact per WP:DYK#Cited hook. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Banac, Ivo (1988). With Stalin against Tito: Cominformist Splits in Yugoslav Communism. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-2186-1., pp. 125–126Perović, Jeronim (2007). "The Tito–Stalin split: a reassessment in light of new evidence". Journal of Cold War Studies. 9 (2). MIT Press: 32–63. doi:10.5167/uzh-62735. ISSN 1520-3972., pp. 58–61
Just realised that a cite must be at the end of the sentence. Added now. Sorry, did not know about this requirement - it's been a while since my last DYK Tomobe03 (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)