Template:Did you know nominations/To Catch a Copper
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 01:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
To Catch a Copper
- ...
that the makers of To Catch a Copper wanted to showcase "an enjoyable journey of officers solving cases", but instead discovered "a misconduct process that was unfit for purpose"?Source: The Guardian- Reviewed: Zhaun Zhu and Rainforest (EP)
Created by Bilorv (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 43 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.— Bilorv (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
- @Bilorv: you have 45 nominations so another qpq is required. Bruxton (talk) 21:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: I found the hook confusing in that the end of the quote is truncated. I will propose a serious tweak which still keeps the hook at 197 characters.
- ALT0a: ... that To Catch a Copper hoped to show "an enjoyable journey of officers solving cases", but discovered "a misconduct process that was unfit for purpose in addressing seriously concerning behaviour"?
