Template:Did you know nominations/Triathlon at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Triathlon at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Women's[edit]

(

)

... that the margin of victory in the women's triathlon at the 2012 Summer Olympics was approximately 15 centimetres?

ALT1:... that the winner of the women's triathlon at the 2012 Summer Olympics was decided by a photo finish?
Reviewed: Baba Sidhaye

5x expanded by Yellow Dingo (talk). Self-nominated at 11:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.

- ✓ This article has been expanded from 444 chars to 9683 chars since 19:25, 09 August 2016 (UTC), a 21.81-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 9683 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 41.5% confidence. (confirm)
  - Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

• No overall issues detected

- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 108 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 95 characters
- ✓ Yellow Dingo has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Baba Sidhaye was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 12:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

New enough - readable prose expanded more than fivefold. Long enough. Well-written and referenced. Hook caught my interest despite having little knowledge of the sport. Good to go. Citobun (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)