Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tsilla Chelton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected' by  MehrajMir  (Talk) 15:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Tsilla Chelton[edit]

Created/expanded by Comte0 (talk). Self nom at 16:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Looks good, but I'd suggest a bit more explanation about the film role: ALT1: "... that Tsilla Chelton became famous at 71 for the role of Auntie Danielle Billard in the film Tatie Danielle?" Offenbach (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I'd prefer the shorter hook, since the explanation is given in Tatie Danielle. Also, the translation of tatie Danielle is Auntie Danielle, Auntie Danielle Billard is virtually unknown in French. But then, I don't really mind. Any other advice? Comte0 (talk) 13:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
  • OK, how about ALT2: "... that Tsilla Chelton became famous at 71 for playing the title character in the film Tatie Danielle?" That would at least make it clear that this is a movie role. Offenbach (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
  • This one is OK with me. Thank you for the suggestions, Comte0 (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Happy to approve ALT2. Offenbach (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Only 1127 characters of prose, per DYKcheck. Needs a minimum of 1500 for DYK purposes. Please keep typing. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Nominator has just posted on my talk page that an expansion will be attempted. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
  • 10 days of no action; nothing seems to be happening to address the above concerns. Schwede66 03:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I think seven days from the time of posting an intent to try is reasonable, especially with the weekend still to go. Two more days, please. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. But still no action, so here's the 'no' again. Schwede66 18:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I appreciate the additional time; thanks for holding off. I wish there had been a response in that week. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)