Template:Did you know nominations/Tukgahgo Mountain

 The following is an archived discussion of Tukgahgo Mountain's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC).

Tukgahgo Mountain

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in 1991, when the sampling was carried out by geologists, the Tukgahgo Mountain (pictured) formations were given the title "Chilly"?

• Reviewed: Two articles. Template:Did you know nominations/Shana Madoff
  

Created/expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 05:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

• None of the minerals listed in the lead are actually minerals. All are elements, with the exception of quartzite, which is a rock. Also the site referenced in ref three is Mindat.org, not "Mindata organization" and the Tukgahgo Mountain entry there shows no listings for native silver, gold, platinum or palladium. The name "chilly" is an informal name and needs to be noted as such. The hook is inaccurate by giving the impression the name is a formal designation.--Kevmin § 02:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

• Addressed issues raised above. Hook is reworded as ALT1: ... that in 1991, when the sampling was carried out by geologists, the Tukgahgo Mountain (pictured) formations were initially given the informal title "Chilly"? --Nvvchar. 06:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Looking better, though I have reread the Mindat entry again and see that the formation informally named "Chilly" is in-fact not part of Tukgahgo Mountain but located southeast of it. I would suggest this as an alternative-
• ALT2: ... that during sampling in 1991, a geologic formation near Tukgahgo Mountain (pictured) was informally named "Chilly"? --Kevmin § 22:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

• OK. The alt2 hook is fine.Thanks.--Nvvchar. 02:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• If QPQ review credit is to be claimed, it needs to be completed (including signature), which should be easy enough to do. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry for missing it again. Done now.--Nvvchar. 03:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

• Can you please address the subsequent issues raised? Right now, your review has been overtaken by events, and the nomination requires a new approval. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. QPQ issues satisfied with new approval. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

• alt2 hook needs reviewing. Earlier hooks struck, as each had issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

• As the proposer of alt 2, I see no problems with the article or hook at this time.--Kevmin § 16:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

• Article new enough, long enough, well-referenced, no close paraphrasing seen in sources. ALT2 hook ref verified. QPQ complete. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)