Template:Did you know nominations/University of Minnesota Messenia Expedition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kusma (talk) 08:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

University of Minnesota Messenia Expedition

Improved to Good Article status by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 15:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/University of Minnesota Messenia Expedition; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Comment: Thank you for nominating. If I can stick my oar in, I think ALT1 is the most interesting of the three; I worry that the top-line hook might be a little pedestrian or meaningless to any readers who aren't already interested in Mycenaean archaeology. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
  • New GA that looks really good, can't find any problems there. The hooks are short, interesting and supported in the article; AGF on the offline sources. I agree with UndercoverClassicist that ALT1 is the most interesting one, but there are no real problems with the others either. QPQ is done. Ffranc (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)