Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Orlady (talk) 22:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike

[edit]

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nominated at 06:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Well, I can approve this article, whether or not it goes up on its own or in a multi-hook. Personally I think it's better to go with separate hooks, so more attention is drawn to each article. Hook fact is verified in this source[1], though it's written more as a throwaway line in the article. I'd recommend a slight rewrite to the hook:
  • And definitely support holding this for June 10. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • The only way I would go with this as a separate hook is if the others are not approved. I am going for the record.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Are the multi hooks really that confusing? They don't seem any worse than say the one at Template:Did you know nominations/Ashtabharya et. al.‎ P.S. I just added a new alt4 and a simpleton alt5.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 11:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
  • The alt5 there is definitely the most understandable. Because the play titles look like chunks of English text they make the sentences in the hooks tricky to understand. So if you say a lot, the meaning will be lost to the rapid reader. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)