Template:Did you know nominations/Vardøger (band), Whitefrozen, Ghost Notes (Vardøger album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Vardøger (band), Whitefrozen, Ghost Notes (Vardøger album)

  • ... that the band Vardøger formed, recorded music, disbanded, reformed to release Whitefrozen, disbanded again, reformed to release Ghost Notes, and then disbanded yet again?

Created by 3family6 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC).

  • 2239 characters (367 words) "readable prose size"; Created on April 13; Hook is 170 readable characters (ignoring markup); Hook is well sourced and interesting. --Slashme (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • This nomination needs a full review of all 3 articles. Yoninah (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Oops, good point! Whitefrozen has 2474 characters (401 words) "readable prose size" and was created on April 14, which is within the time limit from proposal Ghost notes has 3753 characters (600 words). Both of these articles are well enough sourced to pass the GNG, and as noted above, the hook itself is well sourced. --Slashme (talk) 09:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @Slashme: in addition to newness and article length, a review should cover all five main DYK criteria, which also include hook cited inline (the hook fact only needs to be in one article in a multiple nomination), neutrality, a check for close paraphrasing, and confirmation that a full review of a different article has been done as a QPQ for as many articles as are nominated. It would also help the promoter (me) to see that each article meets the criteria in a clear way, like:
  • Review for Vardøger (band):
  • Review for Whitefrozen:
  • Review for Ghost Notes (Vardøger album):
  • Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 10:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed for all three articles; it's been ten days. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Starting afresh. These three articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline in the band article, the articles are neutral and I detected no copyright issues. The hook is a bit repetitive, but it is difficult to see how it could be better expressed while still linking to all three articles. Three QPQs have been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)