Template:Did you know nominations/Velodona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Velodona[edit]

Illustration of Velodona togata

5x expanded by Sven Manguard (talk). Self nominated at 02:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC).

Amazing job! This article appears to meet all of the criteria for a DYK? nomination right now. Thus, I'd say that it is currently good to go! :) Futurist110 (talk) 03:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Futurist, this does not qualify as a QPQ for you per DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed. — Maile (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Ping did not show up in my Notifications. Well, it mostly means Fururist110 can't use this as a QPQ because lack of specifics in their "review" doesn't really tell us anything was reviewed. You have, perhaps, seen this same type of message on various DYKs the last few weeks. And not just by me, but people trying to cut down the chances of something being pulled from the main page because of...whatever...I hadn't planned on doing this review myself. But in your spot, I believe I would be asking the same question— Maile (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: If the suggested pic is scheduled to be POTD only a few short weeks away, we should not use the same pic on DYK now. If we are using this pic on DYK, maybe the POTD date can be delayed? I don't think we should use the same pic on MainPage twice within a short time. It's better to let another pic get the exposure on MainPage. --PFHLai (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC) I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#FPs on DYK about this issue. --PFHLai (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
    • PFHLai: There was a second illustration (which I actually find more useful than the FP). I've swapped out the FP in favor of this one. There should be no issues now. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

The following has been checked in this review by Maile

  • DYK Check confirms "Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 14 edits ago on January 17, 2014" and has 5526 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Every paragraph sourced
  • Hook is stated in the article and sourced
  • Duplication Detector run on each of the 6 sources and showed no copyvio issues
  • Image is in the article and sourced on Commons as Public Domain
  • Good 2 go. — Maile (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)