Template:Did you know nominations/Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (2014)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (2014)
[edit]- ... that Verizon v. FCC (2014) was reported to be the death of network neutrality, having vacated two of the FCC Open Internet Order 2010's three regulations?
Created by Amcconachie (talk). Nominated by Wh-237 (talk) at 22:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC).
Created on 18 February, nominated on 5 March. Not eligible as a new article and expansion is insufficient. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 16:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Review needed. Article history clearly shows that the article was moved from userspace to mainspace on March 2, when it became new by DYK rules. Since the article was nominated three days later, on March 5, it clearly was nominated while still new, and is indeed eligible. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook is well-sourced and the article well-referenced. No policy issues noted and no QPQ required. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
