Template:Did you know nominations/Viola flettii
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Viola flettii
[edit]
... that Viola flettii (Olympic violet, pictured) is one of seven species of plants found only in the Olympic Mountains of northwestern United States, a refugium isolated by ice during the last glacial period?
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Fossil Lake (Oregon)ALT1:... that the Olympic violet (Viola flettii, pictured) is a rare plant found only on the eastern and northeastern peaks of the Olympic Mountains in Washington state?
Created by Wsiegmund (talk). Self nominated at 01:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC).
I suggest- ALT2:
... that the Olympic violet (pictured) is a plant found only on the eastern and northeastern peaks of the Olympic Mountains?
- (Decide to use English OR Latin name, no need to mention the state if there's a link to the park, no need to say "rare" when the hook expresses that.) - Did you know that you have to do a review now if you have 5 or more DYK credits? - Article is new enough and long enough, well sourced (but I don't find the "seven" of the original hook in the ref. - How about giving the name "Flett's violet" also? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:16, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Gerda, your alt looks the best but we should add back in Washington state at the end.--MONGO 13:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- You mean because it would look Greek?
- ALT3: ... that the Olympic violet (pictured) is a plant found only on the eastern and northeastern peaks of the Olympic Mountains in Washington state? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Wonderful...stupendous... ah awesome!--MONGO 14:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- ALT3 preferred, and it's not by me, I only reduced ALT1, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- A QPQ review, please, then I am ready to approve, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- In progress… Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Completed. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for looking at Fossil Lake (Oregon)! You could have mentioned it here already when you made your first comment there, a review is a review even if no approval yet. As we agree on ALT3, I strike the others, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
(sorry, I forgot) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Wonderful...stupendous... ah awesome!--MONGO 14:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Gerda, your alt looks the best but we should add back in Washington state at the end.--MONGO 13:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- (Decide to use English OR Latin name, no need to mention the state if there's a link to the park, no need to say "rare" when the hook expresses that.) - Did you know that you have to do a review now if you have 5 or more DYK credits? - Article is new enough and long enough, well sourced (but I don't find the "seven" of the original hook in the ref. - How about giving the name "Flett's violet" also? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:16, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
