Template:Did you know nominations/Women's London Championship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Women's London Championship

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 20:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC).

  • checkY Article is long enough (1766 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace 24 March, nominated same day), and article is within poicy
  • checkY Hook is short enough, interesting, in the article and well sourced
  • checkY QPQ done
  • Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't it say "viewed as a response to..." or "a reaction to..." or something similar rather than "viewed as breakaway" - it's not a breakaway is it? Many of the players will also play in the 100 and it's some time after franchise cricket has been established. Dobell says "something of a breakaway" which is much softer, especially in context. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)