Template:Did you know nominations/Woodhaven Boulevard (IND Queens Boulevard Line)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Woodhaven Boulevard (IND Queens Boulevard Line)[edit]
Northbound platform at Woodhaven Boulevard
- ... that the Woodhaven Boulevard–Slattery Plaza subway station is named after a plaza that no longer exists? FYI, Subway stations retain signs listing places and streets that no longer exist, Ely Around in Queens
- ALT1:... that as a result of the 1950s construction of the Long Island Expressway, one must now cross highway ramps to access the Woodhaven Boulevard subway station? SUBWAY-SIDEWALK INTERFACE PROJECT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IV ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
- ALT2:... that the Woodhaven Boulevard station was proposed to be converted to serve express trains as part of a never-built expansion of the New York City Subway? 3 Routes Proposed to Aid Growing Queens Areas, Adding City Transit Line to Rockaways Is Chamber '47 Goal
- Reviewed: Cerro de las Campanas
- Comment: Image is optional
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk), Tdorante10 (talk), and Kew Gardens 613 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 03:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC).
Promoted to GA two days before nom. Long enough. Within guidelines. All proposed hooks are appropriate length. Alt0 is most interesting. All are thoroughly sourced. Image is acceptable but not necessary. QPQ still shows pending. Will approve once QPQ is met. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)- @Argento Surfer: Thank you for the review. I've done the QPQ. epicgenius (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Everything looks good. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
