Template:Did you know nominations/Yale Institute of International Studies
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Yale Institute of International Studies[edit]
- ... that the Yale Institute of International Studies (1935–51) was a bastion of international relations realism and sought to have its research influence the decisions of U.S. government officials?
Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 17:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC).
- Hook comment: I think we can drop everything in the hook after "and." Surely all or most international research institutes seek to have their research be influential? Neutralitytalk 04:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Influential among other academics, certainly, but influential among government officials, not always. But how about something more specific:
- ALT1: ... that the Yale Institute of International Studies (1935–51) was a bastion of international relations realism and sent brief reports of its research to some 1,500 U.S. government officials? Wasted Time R (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- That's much better. Neutralitytalk 08:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Influential among other academics, certainly, but influential among government officials, not always. But how about something more specific:
Despite being an old nomination now, this was nominated within a week of its creation, so new enough. It was easily long enough at nomination time and is longer now, with no significant writing quality issues or maintenance tags. Sourcing meets DYK standards for the article in general, and I think the claim about realism in the hook is supported by the phrase "led the cause of policy-oriented realism" on p.85 of the hook source. I'm not sure where exactly "sought to have its research influence the decisions of U.S. government officials" is supposed to be sourced in the article, and I agree with the criticism of it, but anyway I much prefer the greater specificity of ALT1, which is short enough and adequately sourced. Earwig's Copyvio Detector found nothing of interest. QPQ done. Good to go with ALT1. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
