Template:Did you know nominations/Yumi Nu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 04:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Yumi Nu

Created by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 04:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC).

  • Very new, as in submitted within one day of creation. (Such a shame this wasn't reviewed sooner, given how timely it was when it was created...I wish there was a way to flag the super "timely" DYKs when they are "hot"...then again maybe it's just as well since it received nearly 60,000 pageviews on the on the day this DYK was originally submitted and a total of nearly 170,000 pageviews to date.) Long enough. Well sourced. Earwig picks up two possible copyright violations, but it appears both of these web pages copied your Wikipedia article, not the other way around!!! (Again, because the article was so incredibly timely in providing information that the entire Internet was looking for...) Turning to the hook, it is indeed backed up by citations within the article. I think it's interesting you decided not to mention "plus-sized" which is attention-getting, but this approach is ok too. My main critique about the hook actually is that it looks like a lot of blue links – personally I think it's too many – so I would actually unlink Vogue because it's familiar enough to a large number of readers. (The more wikilinks you include, the more you're confusing the reader and sharing traffic with those other pages – do you really need to send more people to Vogue which is well known?) The final comment is just raising the question whether this article needs to be updated given how much has "happened" since you first created the article... Maybe just a sentence or two to acknowledge "reception" (including positive reactions) as well as "controversy" and "backlash" and how she handled it, while maintaining the neutral tone within the article? Anyway it's fine either way. Thanks for creating this article. Cielquiparle (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)