Jump to content

Template:GAProgress/doc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This template is a progress assessment tool for Good Article reviews. The user may adjust its parameters to indicate whether each of the good article criteria are met as a review progresses. It is a quick and simple template, in contrast to other more detailed review templates.

The syntax for all parameters is as follows:

  • y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol:
  • n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol:
  • ?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh all produce a question symbol:
  • wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:
  • hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol:
  • neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol:
  • blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol

Usage

[edit]

This template should be substituted since the GA criteria are reviewed from time to time and this template may change.

Blank template for copy-pasting in one-line format

{{subst:GAProgress | prose = | mos = | reflayout = | reliablesources = | originalresearch =  |copyvio = | broadness = | focus = | neutral = | stable = | freeortaggedpics = | picsrelevant = }}
Vertical template for copy-pasting with commented reminders of full GA criteria 

{{subst:GAProgress
| prose = <!-- the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct -->
| mos = <!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation -->
| reflayout = <!-- it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout -->
| reliablesources = <!-- it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged -->
| originalresearch = <!-- it contains no original research -->
| copyvio = <!-- it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism --> 
| broadness = <!-- it addresses the main aspects of the topic -->
| focus = <!-- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail -->
| neutral = <!-- it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each -->
| stable = <!-- it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute -->
| freeortaggedpics = <!-- images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content -->
| picsrelevant = <!--  images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions -->
}}

Example

[edit]
{{subst:GAProgress
| prose =            y
| mos =              n
| reflayout =        y
| reliablesources =  ?
| originalresearch = y
| copyvio =          y
| broadness =        y
| focus =            y
| neutral =          neu
| stable =           y
| freeortaggedpics = 
| picsrelevant =     y
}}

results in:

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed