Jump to content

Template:Opinion polling for the 2021 California gubernatorial recall election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Newsom recall[edit]

Aggregate polls
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Yes on recall No on recall Undecided Margin
Real Clear Politics September 6–13, 2021 September 14, 2021 41.8% 56.3% 1.9% No on recall +14.5
FiveThirtyEight August 27 – September 14, 2021 September 14, 2021 41.5% 57.3% 1.2% No on recall +15.8
Average 41.7% 56.8% 1.5% No on recall +15.1
Result 38.12% 61.88% No on recall +23.76
Graphical summary
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
Yes
on recall
No
on recall
Undecided
2021 CA gubernatorial election September 14, 2021 12,892,578 38.12% 61.88%
The Trafalgar Group (R) September 11–13, 2021 1,082 (LV) ± 3.0% 45% 53% 2%
Momentive August 31 – September 13, 2021 3,985 (LV) ± 1.6% 41% 55% 4%
Emerson College September 10–11, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 40% 60% 1%
Data for Progress (D) September 2–10, 2021 2,464 (LV) ± 2.0% 43% 57%
SurveyUSA September 7–8, 2021 930 (LV) ± 4.2% 41% 54% 5%
Suffolk University September 6–7, 2021 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 41% 58% 1%
Berkeley IGS August 30 – September 6, 2021 7,917 (LV) ± 2.0% 38% 60% 1%
The Trafalgar Group (R) September 2–4, 2021 1,079 (LV) ± 3.0% 43% 53% 4%
YouGov August 30 – September 1, 2021 1,618 (LV) ± 3.0% 43% 57%
The Trafalgar Group (R) August 26–29, 2021 1,088 (LV) ± 3.0% 44% 52% 4%
Public Policy Institute of California August 20–29, 2021 1,080 (LV) ± 4.5% 39% 58% 3%
SurveyUSA August 26–28, 2021 816 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 51% 6%
Gravis Marketing August 25–27, 2021 729 (LV) ± 3.6% 45% 50% 5%
Targoz Market Research August 23–25, 2021 787 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 52% 6%
Change Research (D) August 22–25, 2021 782 (LV) ± 3.7% 42% 57% 1%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies August 20–22, 2021 1,000 (RV) ± 3.1% 41% 48% 11%[b]
964 (LV) ± 3.2% 43% 51% 7%
YouGov August 6–12, 2021 1,585 (RV) ± 3.4% 46% 54%
1,534 (LV) ± 3.8% 48% 52%
SurveyUSA August 2–4, 2021 613 (LV) ± 5.0% 51% 40% 9%
Emerson College July 30 – August 1, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 46% 48% 6%
Core Decision Analytics July 27–29, 2021 804 (RV) ± 3.5% 41% 52% 7%
~728 (LV) ± 3.6% 44% 51% 5%
Berkeley IGS July 18–24, 2021 5,795 (RV) ± 2.0% 36% 51% 13%
3,266 (LV) ± 2.5% 47% 50% 3%
Emerson College July 19–20, 2021 1,085 (RV) ± 2.9% 43% 48% 9%
Change Research (D) June 11–16, 2021 1,085 (RV) ± 3.0% 40% 54% 6%
Moore Information Group (R)[A] June 1–3, 2021 800 (RV) ± 3.0% 44% 50% 6%
682 (LV) ± 4.0% 49% 46% 5%
Tulchin Research (D) May 21–30, 2021 1,500 (RV) ± 2.5% 37% 50% 13%
1,168 (LV) ± 2.9% 38% 52% 9%
Public Policy Institute of California May 9–18, 2021 1,074 (LV) ± 4.2% 40% 57% 3%
Berkeley IGS April 29 – May 5, 2021 10,289 (RV) ± 2.0% 36% 49% 15%
7,943 (LV) ± 2.3% 42% 50% 8%
SurveyUSA April 30 – May 2, 2021 642 (RV) ± 5.3% 36% 47% 17%
McLaughlin & Associates (R)[B] April 15–19, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 45% 45% 10%
Public Policy Institute of California March 14–23, 2021 1,174 (LV) ± 3.9% 40% 56% 5%
Probolsky Research (R) March 16–19, 2021 900 (RV) ± 3.3% 40% 46% 14%
900 (LV)[c] ± 3.3% 35% 53% 13%
Emerson College March 12–14, 2021 1,045 (RV) ± 3.0% 38% 42% 20%[d]
WPA Intelligence (R)[C] February 12–14, 2021 645 (LV) ± 3.9% 47% 43% 10%
Berkeley IGS January 23–29, 2021 10,357 (RV) ± 2.0% 36% 45% 20%
7,980 (LV) ± 2.4% 36% 49% 15%
Remington Research (R)[D] March 17–18, 2019 1,303 (LV) ± 2.7% 31% 52% 17%

Replacement candidates[edit]

The table below contains all candidates who had polled at or above 2% since the filing deadline for the recall, had raised at least $100,000 (excluding loans and including at least $5,000 in the most recent filing period), were a current or former elected official, or were otherwise considered notable in their own right. The graphical summary includes all candidates who met at least one of those criteria and had appeared in at least four separate publicly released polls.

Aggregate polls
Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Elder (R) Paffrath (D) Faulconer (R) Cox (R) Kiley (R) Jenner (R) Other/Undecided
[e]
Margin
Real Clear Politics August 20 – Sep 13, 2021 Sep 13, 2021 32.4% 7.8% 5.3% 4.0% 3.1% 1.3% 46.1% Elder +24.6
FiveThirtyEight July 18 – Sep 13, 2021 Sep 13, 2021 29.7% 6.1% 5.1% 4.5% 3.0% 1.0% 50.6% Elder +23.6
Average 31.1% 7.0% 5.2% 4.3% 3.1% 1.2% 48.4% Elder +24.1
Result 48.4% 9.6% 8.0% 4.1% 3.5% 1.0% 25.4% Elder +38.8
Graphical summary
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
(I) Angelyne
(D) Holly Baade
(R) John Cox
(D) John Drake
(R) Larry Elder
(R) Kevin Faulconer
(R) Ted Gaines
(L) Jeff Hewitt
(R) Caitlyn Jenner
(G) Dan Kapelovitz
(R) Kevin Kiley
(D) Patrick Kilpatrick
(D) Jacqueline McGowan
(R) Doug Ose
(D) Kevin Paffrath
(D) Armando Perez-Serrato
(D) Brandon Ross
(D) Joel Ventresca
(D) Daniel Watts
Other
Undecided
None
2021 CA gubernatorial election Sep 14, 2021 7,361,568 0.5% 1.3% 4.1% 0.9% 48.4% 8.0% 0.7% 0.7% 1.0% 0.9% 3.5% 1.2% 2.9% 0.4% 9.6% 1.2% 5.3% 2.5% 2.3% 4.6%
The Trafalgar Group (R) Sep 11–13, 2021 1,082 (LV) ± 3.0% 3% 1% 41% 4% 1% 4% 4% 10% 1% 9% 23%
Emerson College Sep 10–11, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 3% 6% 30% 4% 2% 4% 3% 1% 6% 3% 6% 34%
Data for Progress (D) Sep 2–10, 2021 2,557 (LV) ± 2.0% 2% 7% 22% 4% 1% 3% 4% 6% 5% 3% 5% 7% 29%
SurveyUSA Sep 7–8, 2021 597 (LV) ± 5.5% 4% 8% 4% 29% 6% 2% 3% 2% 4% 9% 1% 3% 2% 2% 6% 13%
Suffolk University Sep 6–7, 2021 233 (LV) ± 6.4% 0% 0% 4% 1% 39% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 2% 0% 5% 0% 2% 1% 7%
Berkeley IGS Aug 30 – Sep 6, 2021 4,707 (LV) ± 2.6% 1% 4% 1% 38% 8% 1% 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 10% 1% 3% 2% 1% 8% 16%
The Trafalgar Group (R) Sep 2–4, 2021 1,079 (LV) ± 3.0% 3% 32% 4% 1% 4% 3% 13% 11% 29%
YouGov Aug 30 – Sep 1, 2021 1,618 (LV) ± 3.0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 24% 5% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 7% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4%[f] 39%
The Trafalgar Group (R) Aug 26–29, 2021 1,088 (LV) ± 3.0% 4% 29% 4% 1% 0% 22% 9% 30%
Public Policy Institute of California Aug 20–29, 2021 1,080 (LV) ± 4.5% 3% 26% 5% 1% 3% 14% 24% 25%
SurveyUSA Aug 26–28, 2021 515 (LV) ± 5.2% 5% 6% 2% 27% 5% 2% 5% 5% 6% 3% 5% 2% 12% 14%
Gravis Marketing Aug 25–27, 2021 729 (LV) ± 3.6% 4% 22% 6% 1% 2% 3% 3% 4% 18% 16% 21%
Targoz Market Research Aug 23–25, 2021 787 (LV) ± 3.5% 13% 12% 7% 3% 3% 2% 13% 4% 20% 23%
Change Research (D) Aug 22–25, 2021 782 (LV) ± 3.7% 2% 2% 27% 3% 1% 4% 5% 1% 6% 3% 3% 7% 15% 22%
YouGov Aug 6–12, 2021 1,534 (LV) ± 3.8% 3% 23% 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 13% 5% 25% 20%
SurveyUSA Aug 2–4, 2021 545 (LV) ± 5.4% 10% 23% 5% 4% 3% 4% 27% 5% 20%
Emerson College Jul 30 – Aug 1, 2021 1,000 (LV) ± 3.0% 7% 23% 4% 7% 5% 0% 1% 14% 40%
Core Decision Analytics Jul 27–29, 2021 803 (RV) ± 3.5% 1% 1% 4% 0% 9% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 9%[g] 34% 22%
~728 (LV) ± 3.6% 1% 1% 4% 0% 10% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 0% 1% 8%[h] 32% 22%
Berkeley IGS Jul 18–24, 2021 5,795 (RV) ± 2.0% 1% 2% 7% 1% 12% 8% 0% 1% 2% 1% 3% 0% 2% 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% 1%[i] 44%
3,266 (LV) ± 2.5% 0% 1% 10% 1% 18% 10% 0% 1% 3% 1% 5% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 0% 2% 1%[j] 40%
Emerson College Jul 19–20, 2021 1,085 (RV) ± 2.9% 6% 16% 6% 4% 4% 0% 2% 8% 53%
Moore Information Group (R)[A] Jun 1–3, 2021 800 (RV) ± 3.0% 22% 11% 6% 4% 18% 39%
682 (LV) ± 4.0% 24% 12% 6% 4% 17% 37%
SurveyUSA Apr 30 – May 2, 2021 642 (RV) ± 5.3% 9% 3% 5% 2% 17%[k] 26% 38%
Hypothetical polling
Full-field ballot including potential Democratic candidates
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
John
Cox
(R)
Kevin
de León
(D)
Kevin
Faulconer
(R)
Caitlyn
Jenner
(R)
Doug
Ose
(R)
Tom
Steyer
(D)
Antonio
Villaraigosa
(D)
Other Undecided
Moore Information Group (R)[A] Jun 1–3, 2021 800 (RV) ± 3.0% 16% 4% 7% 4% 2% 5% 9% 14% 38%
682 (LV) ± 4.0% 18% 4% 8% 4% 2% 5% 8% 13% 37%
Antonio Villaraigosa vs. Kevin Faulconer
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
Antonio
Villaraigosa (D)
Kevin
Faulconer (R)
Undecided
WPA Intelligence (R)[C] Feb 12–14, 2021 645 (LV) ± 3.9% 28% 31% 41%

Notes[edit]

General polling notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. ^ Includes "won't vote" with 3%
  3. ^ Weighted by vote propensity
  4. ^ Includes "would not vote" with 6%
  5. ^ Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  6. ^ Stoner, Loebs, Trimino, and Moore with 1%; Lozano, Collins, Newman, Lodge, Richter, Martinez, Gallucci, Symmon, Furin, Le Roux, Stephens, Hillberg, Kaul, Hanink, Papagan, Marciniak, Lucey, Killens, Wildstar, Singh, Zacky, Bramante, and Mercuri with 0%
  7. ^ Bramante, Gallucci, Lodge, Lozano, Lucey, Marciniak, Stoner, Trimino, and Wildstar with 1%; Collins, Furin, Hanink, Hillberg, Kaul, Killens, Le Roux, Loebs, Martinez, Mercuri, Moore, Newman, Papagan, Richter, Singh, Stephens, Symmon, and Zacky with 0%
  8. ^ Bramante, Lodge, Lozano, Lucey, Marciniak, Stoner, Trimino, and Wildstar with 1%; Collins, Furin, Gallucci, Hanink, Hillberg, Kaul, Killens, Le Roux, Loebs, Martinez, Mercuri, Moore, Newman, Papagan, Richter, Singh, Stephens, Symmon, and Zacky with 0%
  9. ^ Singh with 1%; Collins, Gallucci, Hanink, Loebs, Mercuri, Moore, Lodge, Lozano, Lucey, Bramante, Leroux, Martinez, Stoner, Newman, Richter, Stephens, Trimino, Zacky, Killens, and Wildstar with 0%
  10. ^ Singh with 1%; Gallucci, Collins, Lodge, Mercuri, Hanink, Moore, Richter, Killens, Leroux, Loebs, Martinez, and Trimino with 0%
  11. ^ Grenell with 5%; Cernovich, Mercuri, Moorlach, and Williams with 3%

Polling sponsor notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Poll conducted for Cox's campaign
  2. ^ Poll conducted for the California Republican Party
  3. ^ a b Poll conducted for Faulconer's campaign
  4. ^ Poll conducted for Reform California