Template talk:B-Class

Template:B-Class is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Colour tweak[edit]

{{editprotected}} I wish to propose tweaking the background colour from #c8fb7b to #b2ff66. The reason is that then the B-Class colour would be mid-way between GA-Class (#66ff66) and C-Class (#ffff66). The revised colour is also of greater saturation, making more distinctive. The table below provides a comparison.

Current	GA-Class	B-Class	C-Class
Revised	GA-Class	B-Class	C-Class

Tompw (talk) (review) 10:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can barely tell the difference, so I don't give a damn either way. Happy‑melon 10:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Seems pretty uncontroversial. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you :-) Tompw (talk) (review) 20:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well written[edit]

According to the WP:MOS#Hyphens, the expression well written should be hyphenated. I agree 100%. The B-class [more detailed criteria] incorrectly uses well written. Written is a past participle; well an adverb. The correct expression should be well-written. I propose this correction. ThsQ (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 21:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good show, mate. ThsQ (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icon[edit]

{{editprotected}} After the recent addition to {{A-Class}}, I was wondering if File:Symbol b class.svg could be added to this template. Thanks! -Drilnoth (talk) 00:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the code you would like to have changed. Sandstein 14:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.

{{editprotected}} I think that this will work:

<noinclude>
{|
! </noinclude>class="assess-B {{{class|}}}" style="background: #c2ff66; text-align: center; {{{style|}}}" | [[File:Symbol b class.svg|B-Class article|14px]] '''{{#if:{{{category|}}}|[[:{{{category}}}|B]]|[[:Category:B-Class articles|B]]}}'''<noinclude>
|}
{{pp-template|small=yes}}
{{Documentation|Template:Grading scheme/doc/class}}
</noinclude>

-Drilnoth (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just curious, was there a discussion to make a change that affects so many pages? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not which I am aware of; I brought this up mainly because of the recent edit to {{A-Class}} and thought that a similar change here would make sense, too. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I object until this is discussed more thoroughly (see Template talk:Grading scheme#Adding images). Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 07:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also oppose this change. I can kind of see the point of doing this with A-Class (though I don't necessarily agree with it), but adding icons to the other classes is complete overkill. PC78 (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense. Nevermind, then. -Drilnoth (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've went ahead and nulled this as there appears to be no consensus for the change. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]