Template talk:Br

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 24 December 2021. The result of the discussion was retarget.

no clear, to remove the redirect to "-"[edit]

This template {{Br}} recently redirects to {{-}} (let's call clearing-br). But these shall not be the same! The clearing-br is sometime helpful, OK, but sometimes I would rather need just BR, no clear.

We can compare these two EN templates to another interwiki sister templates: I.e. see the CS templates cs:Šablona:- and compare it to cs:Šablona:Br.

I suggest to change the EN Template:Br to behave the same way as the CS version. --Franta Oashi (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you can see this talk page, as I feel it could be related: Template_talk:-#Time_to_make_this_bad_idea_right --Franta Oashi (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 30 June 2015[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Should redirect to Template:Clear. It is a double redirect. Template:Br redirects to Template:- which redirects to Template:Clear and this creates line: 1. redirectTemplate:Clear in every article Template:Br is used. And it is used in many articles: Pages that link to "Template:Br" as it is used in Navboxes Template:Current APEC Leaders etc. Klõps (talk) 13:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done plus four others. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 9 November 2015[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Please move the redirect category to the 3rd line of the redirect per the guidelines for redirects and the guidelines for redirect categories. Thank you. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 19:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it makes any difference to the output? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request to complete RfD nomination[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Template:Br has been listed at Redirects for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

{{subst:rfd|showontransclusion=1|content=

to the top of the page and }} to the bottom to complete the nomination. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does {{rfd}} support showontransclusion=1? If yes, does that mean the RfD notice will be displayed on all transclusions (if I'm not mistaken, this currently happens by default anyway)? This would lead to widespread disruption, given that this template is used for minor formatting in a lot of places. – Uanfala (talk) 03:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin added the RfD tag (without showing on transclusions). Whether to show the tag on transclusions is being discussed elsewhere, so closing this edit request. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]