Template talk:Chrysler timeline

Timeline name

Shouldn't this temlate be called Chrysler timeline, or something like that? This timeline doesn't deal with the DaimlerChrysler group, but with a single brand/division/marque/whatever. The problem is that there are already many articles with the current name. Can somebody fix this? Or you think the current name is ok? -- NaBUru38 00:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed it to Chrysler timeline - it definitely shouldn't have been DaimlerChrysler. --Vossanova ^o< 17:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

more colores

I think the timeline needs more colores, seperating US-Chryslers, EU-Chryslers etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:FB32:4620:408F:18B3:9D8B:5A31 (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cutoff

This is a nice table, but I think fitting more years will make it unreadable. Yes? No? Mr.choppers | ✎ 12:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least future years won't have many rows to fill... but yes, it could be split into fewer years. How about 1920s-1950s, 1960s-1980s, and 1990s-present, instead of the 1920s-1960s and 1970s-present we have now? --Vossanova ^o< 16:04, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]