Template talk:Did you know/Madam Auring

Madam Auring[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sharktopus ^talk

... that Madam Auring shot to fame when she correctly predicted Amparo Muñoz winning the 1974 Miss Universe title?

Reviewed: If you reviewed another article before listing this DYK nomination, put it here

Created/expanded by TheMoth&TheButterfly (talk). Self nom at 19:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules: Length fine, not too long.
Source: [1] Passes as a RS.
Interest: Got me interested enough to read about her, so I'd say mid-interest level
Image suitability, if applicable: N/A
ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Length: Only 1,375 character (222 words). Falls short of required 1,500 character threshold.
Vintage: Created as new article on July 31, so it's good on that end.
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): All sources are reliable.
Neutrality: Yes.
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: No.
Copyvio: No.
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: Sentences are choppy and short, thus generally unimaginative. Not much variation in prose style either. One of them is a bare URL, and the others are minimally attributed and don't contain any information other than the page title.

Still too short, one paragraph is unreferenced. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article length is OK now (1845 characters), according to DYKcheck. All of the prose is sourced, but the filmography is not sourced -- and the text of the article has the briefest indication that she is an actress in addition to being a fortuneteller. I found a bit of close paraphrasing and I agree that the wording is a bit rough. I've done a bit of clean-up, and I can see possibilities for some more cleanup and expansion, but I haven't seen a good source for her acting. --Orlady (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography seems to check out a IMDB. Good to go after clean-up by Orlady. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also used Duplication Detector to check overlap with one major source and did minor ce before promoting to prep. Sharktopus ^talk 04:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]