Template talk:Did you know/National Safety Council of Australia

National Safety Council of Australia

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

• ... that the private search and rescue company the National Safety Council of Australia had such advanced equipment it was widely believed to be paramilitary?

Created by ShipFan (talk). Self nom at 13:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Comment - Refs support the hook, article is new.Jarhed (talk) 18:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• The article contains a number of uncited sentences. Gatoclass (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

• Not every sentence needs to be cited. WP policy only "requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations". ShipFan (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but we have a higher standard for DYK since it's content that is appearing on the main page. The rule of thumb is at least one cite per paragraph, excluding the intro and any other paragraphs summarizing other content. Gatoclass (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

• Article still has unreferenced paragraphs after 9 days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)