Template talk:Did you know/Parliamentary elections in Singapore

Parliamentary elections in Singapore[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk)

... that during the Singaporean parliamentary general election of 2011 the opposition Workers' Party (rally pictured) won a Group Representation Constituency for the first time?

Reviewed: The Three Graces (Indianapolis)

5x expanded by Jacklee (talk). Self nom at 18:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hook

Length, format, content rules: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Length: Has been expanded 5x. --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Although leads generally have less citations than the body paragraphs, the current lead has no citations.--SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: if the lead is a mere summary of the main text, I do not see the point of it having any citations at all. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's true that leads, which summarize body paragraphs, don't require citations for general statements. But statements regarding specific statistics or recent events, need to be cited, even if they're already mentioned in the article. As the guideline on leads states, "Complex, current, or controversial subjects may require many citations."--SakyaTrizin (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: --SakyaTrizin (talk) 08:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, you need to review an article.--SakyaTrizin (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, OK. Is that still a requirement? I haven't nominated anything for DYK for quite a long time, and I could not find any mention of this in the rules. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 10:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've reviewed "The Three Graces (Indianapolis)". See the link above. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 11:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]