Template talk:Dreyfus affair

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

France

This template is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 14:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DreyfusAffair → Template:Dreyfus affair – Per Dreyfus affair. 86.40.108.73 (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This template has had this name since it was created back in 2004. Moving a template's name causes a lot of unnecessary transclusion via a redirect since all of the articles that currently use this template would then be connected to this template via a redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 02:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not an issue, especially w/ a template as rarely used as this one. Moving should be fine and should be done because the rationale is correct. --The Evil IP address (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Essentially unnecessary, but not harmful. --BDD (talk) 22:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Georges Clemenceau[edit]

Would it be worth adding Georges Clemenceau to people? Dunarc (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also I think Hubert-Joseph Henry would be a worthwhile addition given his major role in the affair. Dunarc (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added Hubert-Joseph Henry in as he is clearly important and would probably not be notable enough to have an article were not for his role in the case. However I have left Clemenceau for now as I think the case for his inclusion is more borderline. Dunarc (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]