Template talk:Fixed

Visually impaired[edit]

As per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(icons)#Remember_accessibility_for_the_visually_impaired.Add |link=|alt= . Thanks Gnevin (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Avenue X at Cicero, 25 August 2011[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

If the template is protected, its missing the red lock. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 06:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 06:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs /doc[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This needs a /doc page. One can be copied from any other template in this series and modified to suit. It needs categorization in this /doc file, too:

 <includeonly>
 <!-- ADD CATEGORIES BELOW THIS LINE -->
 [[Category:Resolution templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 [[Category:Image with comment templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
 <!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE -->

— SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 18:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Please could you write the /doc page? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Resbox wrapper[edit]

Any of the templates in the inline, content-level resolution tag family (like {{Done}} and {{Fixed}}) can now be converted on the fly into a bordered, thread-level resolution hatnote tag (like {{Resolved}}), with the Template:Resbox wrapper. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 13:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 22 April 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add |alt=Check mark icon or similar phrase per MOS:ACCESS#Images. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The image is an icon, not a stand-alone image, and doesn't actually add anything to the content of the message. The bolded text of the message serves the same purpose and conveys the same essential information as the image. It is there as a visual reference to catch the reader's eye, and to someone using a screen reader it would actually make it more difficult to understand the message as there would be extra unnecessary text to read, and no information or functionality is lost by it not being there. See the last example at Wikipedia:Alternative text for images#Examples. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 03:03, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]