This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
I have recently updated the RDT for the Hastings Line to what I would call 'my specifications', albeit generally improving it and correcting a few things. I would like to know what everyone thinks about it before it is posted on the main page. Thank you.
Template:Hastings Line/SandboxNathan A RF (talk) 21:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
TMI. It is generally accepted that not every LC and cross-road should be listed. On the plus side, it’s an improvment to have the distances and lengths both in the right-most column. On the other hand, some lines of text are much too long and should be split into two rows (or simply be edited down with less information). It’s totally unnecessary to have the NR symbol beside every station — or for that matter and — that information properly belongs in the line and station articles. And there is also an excessive amount of bold type: its use should be kept to a minimum, as the wikimarkup automatically inserts it to highlight a link to the current page. Useddenim (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it to Template:Hastings Line/sandbox, that being the normal capitalisation for sandbox subpages of templates (see WP:TESTCASES) - if we had {{documentation}} on this template, lowercase would be the only recognised form. But I do think that it's overdetailed; also, the mileages are supposed to go in the column to the left of the station names, see WP:RDT#BSn row templates. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NR symbol beside every station — or for that matter 
and 
— that information properly belongs in the line and station articles. And there is also an excessive amount of bold type: its use should be kept to a minimum, as the wikimarkup automatically inserts it to highlight a link to the current page. Useddenim (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
