Template talk:Hybrid Air Vehicles

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

SkyCat

SkyCat needs adding. The name refers both to the successor company to Airship Industries and to the main project ongoing at the time of transfer, although there never was a real machine with the name. I am not sure how all that should be handled. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template Content

I would like to start a discussion about the content in this template and where it is best suited. If you look at Boeing or Airbus their boxes are much easier to follow and more relevant - this looks like it could grow to include every airship related company ever! One immediate suggestion is for Airship Industries to be moved the "Related" line as it is a defunct company that is is related to the current one. What is the stance for citing inclusions here? I'd be interested to hear further thoughts and explanations as to why certain subjects are being included and why they are being put where they are. Many thanks. Philbobagshot (talk) 11:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]