Template talk:Infobox high court

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconLaw Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Session / Term[edit]

I would like to add a field for the court session or term length e.g. the Supreme Court of the US has a term from the First Monday in October to the Preceading Day the next year.[1] This is broadly applicable. So without objections I will add this on Monday, 2009-01-05

Awg1010 (talk) 02:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, just please make sure that it is optional to keep the infobox as broadly applicable as possible. Thanks. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I'm not sure how to test the changes so please check my work. In the main part of the code, below terms, insert the following four lines:
|-
{{#if:{{{session|<noinclude>-</noinclude>}}} |
{{!}} '''Dates of court sessions:'''   {{!}}{{!}} {{{session}}}
}}

In the Empty Syntax section, below terms, insert the next line:

|session = <!--start and end dates of court sessions-->

Awg1010 (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2nd chief judge[edit]

I was thinking if a second chief judge parameter could be added, if the court has 2 heads, or 1 head and 1 deputy, the Court of Appeal in England has the Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls, the UK Supreme Court has its President and Deputy President.--Tærkast (Discuss) 11:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody? --Tærkast (Discuss) 16:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This template vs. {{Infobox court}}[edit]

In light of the existence of {{Infobox court}}, is this template necessary? The two templates take almost exactly the same parameters (only differences: high court has an additional country parameter, and court allows a second image, a division map, and a third chief judge). High court has 375 transclusions whereas court has only 95, but I would suggest consolidating on court because of its more generic name. Colin M (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]