Template talk:Koolhoven aircraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the aircraft project.

Red links - missing or something else?

We have two, after a pruning of models known to have been unbuilt project vis, the FK4 and the FK36. Oliver Tapper in his Putnam Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft book suggests the FL4 was the modification of the FK3 fuselage into a airship car (the early FK numbers have kept several good aviation historians contentious and awake at night) so I'm inclined to remove it. There is a Flight letter from JM Bruce about the FK36-39 which I've mislaid but if it was a bigger FK35, as our Koolhoven article states without reference, it may well have been only a project andshould go; after all the FK35 was built but not flown, a casualty of a lorry and the financial collapse of NVI.TSRL (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Found that letter {http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1953/1953%20-%200618.html) but had misremembered the content; he covers AWs and BATs, not the FK30s.TSRL (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]