Template talk:Ledbury and Gloucester Railway
Appearance
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gloucester Docks branch
[edit]Ledbury and Gloucester Railway | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This branch should face Over Junction, not Gloucester Central; also it should come off to the south side of the line, not the north. Further, Gloucester Cathedral is not inside the Tuffley loop, but is to the south-west of Central station (btwn that station and the Docks branch). See right (river largely omitted). --Redrose64 (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- You went to a lot of trouble creating the diagram on the right. Why not fix the actual template instead? :-) —MegaPedant 21:30, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Done after much anger, why did I ever upgrade to Firefox 3.6? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Print-out copies full of white intermediate spaces
[edit]When I tried to take a hard-copy print out this morning, the result looked terrible, with intermediate white spaces every other entry. I am sure that this was not a problem three or four years ago, so what has happened in the mean time?