Jump to content

Template talk:Spider-Man in popular media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal discussion

[edit]

The Spider-Man in popular media template has television, film, theatre, actors, newspaper strip, theme park attractions, parodies, and video games. So the Spider-Man video games template is already a part of the in popular media template. Why keep them as separate templates? Spidey104contribs 20:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support it.-5- (talk) 01:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even with your grammatically horrible objection there is still a consensus of 3 to one. Please stop reverting the edits. It is counter-productive and you can be blocked for edit warring. Thank you. Spidey104contribs 13:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle?

[edit]

Ok, so this came up on my watchlist like it does every now and then, and it struck me that the title of this navbox is pretty lousy. Actually, it's very lousy, as comic books are a popular medium, so the title is completely non1inficitive o content, and kinda implies that comics aren't popular. Now, this is clearly an "other media" template, meaning other than the character's original medium of comics, but I can see someone might find that a bit unclear as well. So I was thinking "Adaptations of Spider-Man" if we don't just want to have the template title match the article that is already linked in the header. (It's also an WP:EASTEREGG link, another strike against it.) The Fantastic Four and X-Men templates do say "other media" in their headers (and the similar templates for DC characters use "franchise media"), so this is the only template to use the "popular media" construction for a major comic character. oknazevad (talk) 00:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]