Template talk:Stubsort

Untitled

{{stub}} isn't deprecated, is it? We should encourage users to do stub-sorting themselves, sure, but a lazy user who adds {{stub}} is still better than a user who does nothing when they stumble on an extremely short article. Should we really discourage users from using it? --Interiot 00:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. I changed the message accordingly. Where (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template redone

I've redone the template with the following changes:

Addresses the user by username
Explains the benefits of stub types
Points to further resources about stubs

Please discuss. — jmorgan (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

changed

I edited the template slightly to use {{tl2}} instead of using a bunch of HTML code tags.
I also moved the... notice... into a notice {{ambox}}, since that's what it's for.
Ω (talk) 04:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I'd like to propose merging this template into {{Stub sort}} or the other way around. Anyone got a strong preference? Gosox⁽⁵⁵⁾₍₅₅₎ 23:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of RfC affecting this page

FYI

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RFC to dissolve Wikiproject Stub Sorting. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]