Jump to content

Template talk:Taxonomy/Streptophyta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/* Template-protected edit request on 31 December 2021 */ new section

[edit]

The CLASS is missing from the classification. It should say - Magnoliopsida 27.33.173.153 (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: I think you might be in the wrong place. There is no place to put a class in this template. You may want . "Magnoliopsida" does not appear in Streptophyta or in the reference linked from this template, so you might need to start a conversation at Talk:Streptophyta. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 10 June 2022

[edit]

I wanted to edit the Taxonomy to reflect the Integrated Taxonomic Information System .gov website. Reads as follows.

Delonix regia (Bojer) Raf. Kingdom Plantae – plantes, Planta, Vegetal, plants

	   Subkingdom	Viridiplantae  – green plants	 
	      Infrakingdom	Streptophyta  – land plants	 
	         Superdivision	Embryophyta 	 
	            Division	Tracheophyta  – vascular plants, tracheophytes	 
	               Subdivision	Spermatophytina  – spermatophytes, seed plants, phanérogames	 
	                  Class	Magnoliopsida 	 
	                     Superorder	Rosanae 	 
	                        Order	Fabales 	 
	                           Family	Fabaceae  – peas, legumes	 
	                              Genus	Delonix Raf.	 
	                                 Species	Delonix regia (Bojer) Raf. – royal poinciana Theovice (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template {{Taxonomy/Streptophyta}}. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. I'm looking at {{Taxonomy/Delonix}}, and it looks like it pretty much matches what you have here. When you post this to the correct talk page (maybe Talk:Delonix regia?), please include a link to the source that you believe has better information. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Format

[edit]

The phylogeny of this plant just says clade all the way down past kingdom 2601:640:8302:7C70:9DE8:62F4:8B5F:928F (talk) 05:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]