This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
As currently formatted, the titling of a separate section for non-state AG's looks visually disruptive and also implies that they are less than state AG's when, in fact they have exactly the same powers and duties. As previously formatted, they appeared immediately after the state AG's without a separate title to single them out beyond not appearing alphabetically intermingled with the state AG's. I would suggest that we should go back to the previous, long-standing format. Discussion? Pr4ever (talk) 03:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And, once again, their peers at the National Association of Attorney Generals do not single them out and place them as "separate but equal". Why should we? Pr4ever (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Comment since more than one state is listed, that should be pluralized, it isn't the state attorney generals of one state (ie. chronological), it is the state attorney generals for multiple states. So Template:U.S. states attorneys general -- there are multiple attorney generals and multiple states. -- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...doesn't the U.S. only have one AG at a time and multiple state AGs (where "state" simply modifies "AG")? Much like how one could have multiple bird feathers or multiple birds' feathers, but not multiple birds feathers. Though...is the plural "attorneys general"?Rotideypoc41352 (talk·contribs) 21:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is only one current state AG at a time, but there are many AGs for a state over time (ie. chronological) ; just as there is one current president but there are many presidents overall. -- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 22:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment yes, per JJPMaster this needs to decapitalize "state". My personal opinion is that "state" should be pluralized as "states", because it concerns more than one state. A template navigating various people who were a particular state's AGs over time would use the singular "state" while a template navigating between multiple states should uses "states". -- 65.93.183.33 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.