This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This looks like reduced utility in the template. Many editors get popups on mouseover of refs, so cobbling together a footnote is a distinct downgrade to the template. Is there an actual point to breaking this feature? VanIsaacWSVexcontribs 11:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Vanisaac. There are over 200 Unicode chart templates that use the same footnote for Unicode version, and if the footnote needs to be changed for the Kangxi Radicals template then it needs to be changed for all of the 200+ templates as well, which is the reason why a change like this should be carefully considered and discussed before implementing. BabelStone (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
