Template talk:WWII British ships

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War II Template‑class

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships Template‑class

	This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Submarines[edit]

I'm having some difficulty reconciling the information on uboat.net with the ones on Wikipedia at: List_of_submarine_classes_of_the_Royal_Navy and List_of_submarine_classes#United_Kingdom. Anyone able to sort this out? Oberiko 16:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minelayers[edit]

This template includes the Abdiel class minelayer in the 'others' section, however, it does not include HMS Adventure (M23) which served in WWII performing identical duties and of similar design. I will add HMS Adventure to the list, and at the same time, move the now 2 classes of Minelayers into their own category. (And they were often called 'cruiser-minelayers' by the way). HibeeJibee (talk) 11:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]