Template talk:WikiProject Organized Labour

Template-protected edit request on 26 November 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change to current version of the sandbox (adding image-needed and infobox-needed parameters). Thank you. Goldsztajn (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Primefac (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: My apologies, I missed a mistake in the code - the |NOTE_2_CAT= parameter was wrong, now corrected - please update with the current version of the sandbox, thank you.--Goldsztajn (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done please note that two categories need creating now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 1 December 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following parameter: |MAIN_CAT = WikiProject Organized Labour articles
Thank you. Goldsztajn (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 00:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add new field editathon

Similar to template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter, I want to add a field for editathon. I tried adding it earlier, but it's not working for me, may be cache related or because it's 6th note, one too many? Any advice/tips? Shushugah (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shushugah, apologies for not being able to participate in this or comment earlier! For future reference, I think it would be better to create a separate template/banner to tag article talk pages created through edit-a-thons... the Women in Red project takes this approach. My concern (hope!) is that if (when!) we get the Organised Labour project running better we would have edit-a-thons once or twice a year...which would relatively quickly fill the banner up with a lot of code if we continue this way. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]