User:Ученик остальные имена заняты/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Начало перевода.

История[edit]

Main article: История экологии

Перед началом[edit]

By ecology, we mean the whole science of the relations of the organism to the environment including, in the broad sense, all the "conditions of existence. "Thus the theory of evolution explains the housekeeping relations of organisms mechanistically as the necessary consequences of effectual causes and so forms the monistic groundwork of ecology.

Ernst Haeckel (1866)[1]: 140  [B]

Экология имеет сложное происхождение, во многом благодаря своей междисциплинарной природе[2]. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Hippocrates and Aristotle were among the first to record observations on natural history. However, they viewed life in terms of essentialism, where species were conceptualized as static unchanging things while varieties were seen as aberrations of an idealized type. This contrasts against the modern understanding of ecological theory where varieties are viewed as the real phenomena of interest and having a role in the origins of adaptations by means of natural selection.[3][4][5] Early conceptions of ecology, such as a balance and regulation in nature can be traced to Herodotus (died c. 425 BC), who described one of the earliest accounts of mutualism in his observation of "natural dentistry". Basking Nile crocodiles, he noted, would open their mouths to give sandpipers safe access to pluck leeches out, giving nutrition to the sandpiper and oral hygiene for the crocodile.[2] Aristotle was an early influence on the philosophical development of ecology. He and his student Theophrastus made extensive observations on plant and animal migrations, biogeography, physiology, and on their behaviour, giving an early analogue to the modern concept of an ecological niche.[6][7]

Nowhere can one see more clearly illustrated what may be called the sensibility of such an organic complex, – expressed by the fact that whatever affects any species belonging to it, must speedily have its influence of some sort upon the whole assemblage. He will thus be made to see the impossibility of studying any form completely, out of relation to the other forms, – the necessity for taking a comprehensive survey of the whole as a condition to a satisfactory understanding of any part.

Stephen Forbes (1887)[8]

Ernst Haeckel (left) and Eugenius Warming (right), two founders of ecology

Ecological concepts such as food chains, population regulation, and productivity were first developed in the 1700s, through the published works of microscopist Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723) and botanist Richard Bradley (1688?–1732).[3] Biogeographer Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859) was an early pioneer in ecological thinking and was among the first to recognize ecological gradients, where species are replaced or altered in form along environmental gradients, such as a cline forming along a rise in elevation. Humboldt drew inspiration from Isaac Newton as he developed a form of "terrestrial physics". In Newtonian fashion, he brought a scientific exactitude for measurement into natural history and even alluded to concepts that are the foundation of a modern ecological law on species-to-area relationships.[9][10][11] Natural historians, such as Humboldt, James Hutton, and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (among others) laid the foundations of the modern ecological sciences.[12] The term "ecology" (German: Oekologie, Ökologie) was coined by Ernst Haeckel in his book Generelle Morphologie der Organismen (1866).[13] Haeckel was a zoologist, artist, writer, and later in life a professor of comparative anatomy.[1][14]

Opinions differ on who was the founder of modern ecological theory. Some mark Haeckel's definition as the beginning;[15] others say it was Eugenius Warming with the writing of Oecology of Plants: An Introduction to the Study of Plant Communities (1895),[16] or Carl Linnaeus' principles on the economy of nature that matured in the early 18th century.[17][18] Linnaeus founded an early branch of ecology that he called the economy of nature.[17] His works influenced Charles Darwin, who adopted Linnaeus' phrase on the economy or polity of nature in The Origin of Species.[1] Linnaeus was the first to frame the balance of nature as a testable hypothesis. Haeckel, who admired Darwin's work, defined ecology in reference to the economy of nature, which has led some to question whether ecology and the economy of nature are synonymous.[18]

The layout of the first ecological experiment, carried out in a grass garden at Woburn Abbey in 1816, was noted by Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species. The experiment studied the performance of different mixtures of species planted in different kinds of soils.[19][20]

From Aristotle until Darwin, the natural world was predominantly considered static and unchanging. Prior to The Origin of Species, there was little appreciation or understanding of the dynamic and reciprocal relations between organisms, their adaptations, and the environment.[4] An exception is the 1789 publication Natural History of Selborne by Gilbert White (1720–1793), considered by some to be one of the earliest texts on ecology.[21] While Charles Darwin is mainly noted for his treatise on evolution,[22] he was one of the founders of soil ecology,[23] and he made note of the first ecological experiment in The Origin of Species.[19] Evolutionary theory changed the way that researchers approached the ecological sciences.[24]

Since 1900[edit]

Modern ecology is a young science that first attracted substantial scientific attention toward the end of the 19th century (around the same time that evolutionary studies were gaining scientific interest). The scientist Ellen Swallow Richards may have first introduced the term "oekology" (which eventually morphed into home economics) in the U.S. as early 1892.[25]

In the early 20th century, ecology transitioned from a more descriptive form of natural history to a more analytical form of scientific natural history.[9][12] Frederic Clements published the first American ecology book in 1905,[26] presenting the idea of plant communities as a superorganism. This publication launched a debate between ecological holism and individualism that lasted until the 1970s. Clements' superorganism concept proposed that ecosystems progress through regular and determined stages of seral development that are analogous to the developmental stages of an organism. The Clementsian paradigm was challenged by Henry Gleason,[27] who stated that ecological communities develop from the unique and coincidental association of individual organisms. This perceptual shift placed the focus back onto the life histories of individual organisms and how this relates to the development of community associations.[28]

The Clementsian superorganism theory was an overextended application of an idealistic form of holism.[29][30] The term "holism" was coined in 1926 by Jan Christiaan Smuts, a South African general and polarizing historical figure who was inspired by Clements' superorganism concept.[31][C] Around the same time, Charles Elton pioneered the concept of food chains in his classical book Animal Ecology.[32] Elton[32] defined ecological relations using concepts of food chains, food cycles, and food size, and described numerical relations among different functional groups and their relative abundance. Elton's 'food cycle' was replaced by 'food web' in a subsequent ecological text.[33] Alfred J. Lotka brought in many theoretical concepts applying thermodynamic principles to ecology.

In 1942, Raymond Lindeman wrote a landmark paper on the trophic dynamics of ecology, which was published posthumously after initially being rejected for its theoretical emphasis. Trophic dynamics became the foundation for much of the work to follow on energy and material flow through ecosystems. Robert MacArthur advanced mathematical theory, predictions, and tests in ecology in the 1950s, which inspired a resurgent school of theoretical mathematical ecologists.[12][34][35] Ecology also has developed through contributions from other nations, including Russia's Vladimir Vernadsky and his founding of the biosphere concept in the 1920s[36] and Japan's Kinji Imanishi and his concepts of harmony in nature and habitat segregation in the 1950s.[37] Scientific recognition of contributions to ecology from non-English-speaking cultures is hampered by language and translation barriers.[36]

This whole chain of poisoning, then, seems to rest on a base of minute plants which must have been the original concentrators. But what of the opposite end of the food chain—the human being who, in probable ignorance of all this sequence of events, has rigged his fishing tackle, caught a string of fish from the waters of Clear Lake, and taken them home to fry for his supper?

Rachel Carson (1962)[38]: 48 

Ecology surged in popular and scientific interest during the 1960–1970s environmental movement. There are strong historical and scientific ties between ecology, environmental management, and protection.[12] The historical emphasis and poetic naturalistic writings advocating the protection of wild places by notable ecologists in the history of conservation biology, such as Aldo Leopold and Arthur Tansley, have been seen as far removed from urban centres where, it is claimed, the concentration of pollution and environmental degradation is located.[12][39] Palamar (2008)[39] notes an overshadowing by mainstream environmentalism of pioneering women in the early 1900s who fought for urban health ecology (then called euthenics)[25] and brought about changes in environmental legislation. Women such as Ellen Swallow Richards and Julia Lathrop, among others, were precursors to the more popularized environmental movements after the 1950s.

In 1962, marine biologist and ecologist Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring helped to mobilize the environmental movement by alerting the public to toxic pesticides, such as DDT, bioaccumulating in the environment. Carson used ecological science to link the release of environmental toxins to human and ecosystem health. Since then, ecologists have worked to bridge their understanding of the degradation of the planet's ecosystems with environmental politics, law, restoration, and natural resources management.[40][12][39][41]

  1. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Stauffer57 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Egerton01 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Odum05 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Benson00 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Sober, E. (1980). "Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism". Philosophy of Science. 47 (3): 350–383. doi:10.1086/288942. JSTOR 186950.
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hughes85 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hughes75 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference Forbes1887 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Kingsland04 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference Rosenzweig03 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hawkins01 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ a b c d e f McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 400. ISBN 0-521-27087-1. Archived from the original on 9 October 2015.
  13. ^ Haeckel, Ernst (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [The General Morphology of Organisms] (in German). Vol. vol. 2. Berlin, (Germany): Georg Reimer. p. 286. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help) From p. 286: "Unter Oecologie verstehen wir die gesammte Wissenschaft von den Beziehungen des Organismus zur umgebenden Aussenwelt, wohin wir im weiteren Sinne alle "Existenz-Bedingungen" rechnen können." (By "ecology" we understand the comprehensive science of the relationships of the organism to its surrounding environment, where we can include, in the broader sense, all "conditions of existence".)
  14. ^ Cite error: The named reference Friederichs58 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hinchman07 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ Cite error: The named reference Goodland75 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Egerton07 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Kormandy78 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Hector02 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference Sinclair26 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference May99 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  22. ^ Cite error: The named reference Darwin was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference Meysman06 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ Cite error: The named reference Acot97 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  25. ^ a b Hunt, Caroline Louisa (1912). The life of Ellen H. Richards (1st ed.). Boston: Whitcomb & Barrows.
  26. ^ Clements, F. E. (1905). Research methods in ecology. Lincoln, Neb.: University Pub. Comp. ISBN 0-405-10381-6.
  27. ^ Cite error: The named reference Simberloff80 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  28. ^ Cite error: The named reference Gleason26 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  29. ^ Levins, R.; Lewontin, R. (1980). "Dialectics and reductionism in ecology" (PDF). Synthese. 43: 47–78. doi:10.1007/bf00413856. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 May 2013.
  30. ^ Cite error: The named reference Wilson88 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  31. ^ Cite error: The named reference Foster08 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  32. ^ a b Elton, C. S. (1927). Animal Ecology. London, UK.: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-226-20639-4.
  33. ^ Cite error: The named reference Allee32 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  34. ^ Cook, R. E. (1977). "Raymond Lindeman and the trophic-dynamic concept in ecology" (PDF). Science. 198 (4312): 22–26. Bibcode:1977Sci...198...22C. doi:10.1126/science.198.4312.22. PMID 17741875. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2012.
  35. ^ Odum, E. P. (1968). "Energy flow in ecosystems: A historical review". American Zoologist. 8 (1): 11–18. doi:10.1093/icb/8.1.11. JSTOR 3881528.
  36. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Ghilarov95 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  37. ^ Cite error: The named reference Itô91 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  38. ^ Carson, R. (2002). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Company. p. 348. ISBN 0-618-24906-0. Archived from the original on 23 November 2015.
  39. ^ a b c Palamar, C. R. (2008). "The justice of ecological restoration: Environmental history, health, ecology, and justice in the United States" (PDF). Human Ecology Review. 15 (1): 82–94. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 July 2011.
  40. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hammond09 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  41. ^ Krebs, J. R.; Wilson, J. D.; Bradbury, R. B.; Siriwardena, G. M. (1999). "The second Silent Spring" (PDF). Nature. 400 (6745): 611–612. Bibcode:1999Natur.400..611K. doi:10.1038/23127. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2013.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ученик_остальные_имена_заняты/sandbox&oldid=925653843"