User:134.197.0.23/Evaluate an Article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evaluate an article[edit]

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

  • Name of article: Constitution of the United States
  • Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I chose this article because it explains the constitution of the United States and that is what our country is based off of.

Lead[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
    • Yes it explains what the constitutions is.
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
    • Yes it has a table of contents.
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
    • No everything in the lead is in the article.
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
    • The lead is very detailed.

Lead evaluation[edit]

Content[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
    • Yes there is not anything in the article that is off topic.
  • Is the content up-to-date?
    • Yes it was last updated yesterday.
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
    • Yes the see also section and the further reading section

Content evaluation[edit]

Tone and Balance[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article neutral?
    • Yes this article is neutral. It just states facts.
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • No bias.
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • The section about the amendments is over represented.
  • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
    • No it does not.

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

Sources and References[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
    • Most of them are backed up by a reliable source.
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
    • The sources are thorough and explain everything very well.
  • Are the sources current?
    • Yes most of the sources are current.
  • Check a few links. Do they work?
    • Yes the links work.

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

Organization[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
    • It is easy to read.
  • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
    • The article only has a couple errors.
  • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
    • Yes the article is broken down into sections based on theme.

Organization evaluation[edit]

Images and Media[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
    • Yes the article has a picture of the declaration of the united states.
  • Are images well-captioned?
    • Yes the images have a title explaining what the image is.
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
    • Yes.
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
    • Yes they all appear well in the article.

Images and media evaluation[edit]

Checking the talk page[edit]

Guiding questions
  • What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
  • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
  • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation[edit]

Overall impressions[edit]

Guiding questions
  • What is the article's overall status?
  • What are the article's strengths?
  • How can the article be improved?
  • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation[edit]

Optional activity[edit]

  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

  • Link to feedback: