User:Already.Know.Who/sandbox

Submission declined on 22 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 days ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 2 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

'Gorbitson & Manger Inc.'

Origin Story[edit]

Gorbitson & Manger was founded by four sisters in 1938 in Shanghai.

Mission[edit]

The goal of Gorbitson & Manger is to generate, sort, file, distribute and archive paper records. The content of said papers matters less than the existence of the paper itself.

Tag Line[edit]

"Triseuses extraordinaire", or "extraordinary sorters" embodies the core values of Gorbitson & Manger.

Governance Structure[edit]

The founders are deceased, but the firm continues sorting through subsequent generations of management. Corporate retreats occur on an ad hoc basis.

Technological Advances[edit]

Gorbitson & Manger employs cutting edge technology to generate and sort papers. Over the years, management has embraced:

Hand-copied notes on stationary
Carbon paper - created a step-function in productivity
Photocopying - exponential output of paper
Digital - another logarithmic increase in paper production and dissemination