Jump to content

User:Bailin yang/Talk:Outline of accounting/Bailin yang Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relevance to the topic of the article[edit]

The content of the article closely follows the history, development and services of LinkedIn, with no off-topic content found. There are no obvious distracting elements that focus on its development and impact as a professional networking service.[edit]

Timeliness of Information and Missing Additions[edit]

The article is labeled as needing to be updated ("This article needs to be updated."), suggesting that there may be a timeliness issue with the information.[edit]

The article omits a description of a recent LinkedIn product or service update, the[edit]

The tone of the article is relatively neutral, providing mostly facts and figures about LinkedIn's evolution. However, there is less description of the discussion of how LinkedIn has impacted workplace culture, the hiring process, or career development.[edit]

There is less discussion of how LinkedIn handles data privacy and user security, and given that this is an important topic for the social media platform, adding this aspect could increase the value and relevance of the article.[edit]

Evaluating the sources[edit]

The article lists a number of cited sources, but without direct links, it is difficult to assess the validity and reliability of these sources. Ensuring that each fact is reliably referenced and that these sources are from a variety of authors and publications is essential to maintaining the neutrality and depth of the article.[edit]

Discussion pages[edit]

No mention is made of the content of Wikipedia's discussion pages. Discussion pages can reveal community feedback and suggestions about the content, structure, or presentation of an article, and help to understand what kind of disagreement or consensus exists among community members about how to present the topic.[edit]

Comprehensive suggestions[edit]

Update with the latest company data and business developments.[edit]

Add discussion of equity gaps, data privacy, and security issues.[edit]

Introduce additional perspectives on how LinkedIn is impacting workplace culture and career development.[edit]

Check and update citation links to ensure diversity and neutrality of sources.[edit]

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)~~~~[edit]

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)