Jump to content

User:Bobthefish2/ArbComEvidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Qwyrxian[edit]

Months ago, he instigated a WQA against me. Though I was new and was condescending, it wasn’t helped by the rude/disruptive behaviour of others involved. The WQA could’ve been fair and assessed behaviours of all involved parties but the request was refused and thus the DR was designed to be simply one-sided. After the WQA, Qwyrxian attempted to present me as the source of incivility problems. He hounded my posts and downplayed violations of others to single me out for civility problems. Examples:

Qwyrxian’s evidence section should show a stark contrast between his emphasis on my behaviour w.r.t. his critique on others. This disproportionate and discriminative hounding is turning into harassment. In addition, here’s his own share of incivility, disruptive editing, and personal-attacks:

  1. He frequently condemns critiques on others as BATTLEGROUND /UNCIVIL regardless of justification while refusing to apply same standards to others. See Qwyrxian’s evidence and content above/below.
  2. He accused me of OWN when I wanted to request user-ban for tendentious-editing [20].
  3. He demonstrated failure in following/understanding/acknowledging his opponent’s reasoning/evidence [21] and later claimed ignorance on these details (we’ve spent 10 months + mediation' on this subject already. [22]. Showed him diffs on details, explained why some guideline shouldn’t apply. Despite my efforts, he kept dismissing my reasons as arbitrary. [23]) [24]. He finally admitted negligence of evidence/arguments/information of opponents, but showed continual failure in recognizing the details by repeatedly dismissing the evidence as unreliable generic search results despite the data being explicitly shown/described to be manually verified literature sources. He continued to force guideline adherence and felt his small hand-sampled encyclopedia/almanacs should be given undue importance. [25][26]. Another round o’explanation. Raised concerns about the sample size of his small sampling of encyclopedia/almanacs. Explained that this small narrow sample shouldn’t be considered more important than the numerous literature/catalogue searches which housed a much more diverse sample of reliable sources. [27]. He attacked me (see #4), got stressed-out, declared a break [28], then returned with erratic behaviour, accused me of taking advantage of him, continued to condemn me for criticizing guidelines ‘’I don’t like’’, asked me to open a map-printing company in response to critique of his sample size (he had only 5 maps). [29]. Final explanation to him which he didn’t reply (also mocked his outburst). [30].
  4. He called me racist over some comics. [31]. User:Benlisquare defended me; I also explained myself [32]. Qwyrxian disregarded, threw a big tantrum about political correctness and racism, insulted me ("allegedly-smart", "trolling"), admitted discriminative bias against me. He refused to apologize/discuss the matter later by saying I was trying to bait him (nice excuse). [33]. BATTLEGROUND anyone?
  5. GAME (See Magog_the_Ogre).

Magog_the_Ogre[edit]

He imposed break-BRD=ban rule [34] and banned Lvhis for breaking BRD. Later, Tenmei broke BRD and Magog refused to block arguing no BRD-breaking [35]. Debated Magog’s decision [36]. Tenmei declared wiki-break [37]. Magog said I was ‘’getting on his nerves’’ [38]. He later closed topic, implied I had sinister agenda [39]. User:Elen_of_the_Roads agreed Magog’s wrong [40]. Qwyrxian gamed the system, argued Tenmei shouldn’t be blocked due to his wiki-break [41], I contradicted [42], he gamed again by saying ban shouldn’t be used for punishment [43], I said ban should be enforced as preventative measure vs. gaming [44]. This matter was closed and Tenmei immediately cancelled wiki-break (guess who’s right about suspecting GAME?) [45]. Later, Magog said I’m nothing but troll due to this [46].

Tenmei[edit]

Principle source of DISRUPT. Principle cause of mediation failure (attacked MedCom/Qwyrxian/myself, refused cooperation). Dumps excessive amount of irrelevant/long/incomprehensible/rude comments/attacks in discussions. Ignores pleas for better communication. See his RFCU for some details.

Others (limited; non-comprehensive)[edit]

Repeated edit-wars that got page locked numerous times (ask User:Nihonjoe). No space to discuss many DISRUPT (but some can be seen in list of UNCIVIL diffs above). Recent example includes someone claiming Taiwanese are not Chinese people [47]. Listed [48] as one of the evidence. Person quietly changed that page w/o discussion/notification (swiftly reverted by someone else) [49].

Diffs[edit]

[50]