User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove
 | It may be difficult to establish notability of this non-Anglophone topic, User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove, because of a lack of English sources and no incentive among anglophone participants well-connected to the Internet to find sources in the native language about User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove. A lack of native language editors working on User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove may make this problem worse. The relative lack of sources and therefore notability may cause the article User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove to unnecessarily go through the deletion process of Wikipedia. These problems may contribute to the documented problem of systemic bias in the English language Wikipedia. Please keep in mind the known systemic biases when judging notability of this topic. Here are some ideas on why the systemic bias matters and what you can do about it. See the talk page of this article to discuss overcoming systemic bias for the article User:Boud/TemplateSystemicBiasRefimprove. Please use this (long) template only on Talk pages, unless there is a delete request posted in the article itself. |
This documentation is just a rough first draft. Please help write it! The template above is intended to help especially for pages which may be unnecessarily proposed for deletion in ways that are statistically consistent with the bias documented and discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
The primary use is meant to be on Talk pages. Use it by typing {{SystemicBiasRefimprove}} on the Talk page of an article from, e.g. a country or region with relatively few English speakers, relatively low access to the internet, relatively low literacy, etc.
The wikipedians who dominate the English language Wikipedia may sometimes nominate a page for deletion without being aware of their statistical bias. In this case, you may type {{SystemicBiasRefimprove}} below the {{delete}} notice and then refer appropriately to Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias in the deletion discussion.