User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA/Assessment
Nepal articles by quality and importance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | |||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Other | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 18 | 20 | |||||
FL | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||||
GA | 2 | 5 | 3 | 99 | 109 | |||
B | 15 | 38 | 40 | 113 | 3 | 209 | ||
C | 17 | 51 | 111 | 503 | 1 | 49 | 732 | |
Start | 32 | 119 | 302 | 2,533 | 1 | 1 | 479 | 3,467 |
Stub | 3 | 64 | 269 | 7,352 | 1 | 1,183 | 8,872 | |
List | 3 | 14 | 34 | 386 | 3 | 85 | 525 | |
Category | 11 | 18 | 8 | 99 | 3,902 | 4,038 | ||
Disambig | 1 | 70 | 50 | 121 | ||||
File | 1 | 53 | 310 | 364 | ||||
Portal | 60 | 60 | ||||||
Project | 44 | 44 | ||||||
Redirect | 2 | 22 | 419 | 422 | 865 | |||
Template | 1 | 6 | 23 | 449 | 479 | |||
NA | 23 | 3 | 26 | |||||
Other | 61 | 61 | ||||||
Assessed | 83 | 316 | 796 | 11,695 | 5,307 | 1 | 1,799 | 19,997 |
Unassessed | 1 | 7 | 313 | 321 | ||||
Total | 83 | 316 | 797 | 11,702 | 5,307 | 1 | 2,112 | 20,318 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 74,340 | Ω = 5.54 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Nepal WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Nepal related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Nepal}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Nepal articles by quality and Category:Nepal articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Nepal WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Quality scale
[edit]Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance assessment
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Nepal}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{WikiProject Nepal| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top |
High |
Mid |
Low |
??? |
The following values may be used for importance assessments:
- Top - adds articles to Category:Top-importance Nepal articles
- High - adds articles to Category:High-importance Nepal articles
- Mid - adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Nepal articles
- Low - adds articles to Category:Low-importance Nepal articles
Importance scale
[edit]Label | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | Core topics about Nepal, vital for the understanding of Nepal or extremely notable to people outside of Nepal. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Nepalese in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance | Nepal, |
High | Topics that are very notable within Nepal, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia | |
Mid | Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Nepal without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally | |
Low | Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics |
Assessment log
[edit]Nepal articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
July 28, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Gurkha Reserve Unit (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- Tiger (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to FA-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Jayaprithvi Highway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 63 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Nepal Foods (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Paralympic swimmers for Nepal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 27, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Bhekh Bahadur Thapa renamed to Bhesh Bahadur Thapa.
- Chand interim cabinet renamed to Fourth Chand cabinet.
Reassessed
[edit]- Islam in South Asia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Nepal at the 2024 Summer Olympics (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Srichchha Pradhan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Bhesh Bahadur Thapa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Fourth Chand cabinet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 62 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
July 26, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Template:House of Representatives constituencies in Province No. 1 renamed to Template:House of Representatives constituencies in Koshi Province.
Reassessed
[edit]- Jagannath Paudel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Speaker of the Karnali Provincial Assembly (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Speaker of the Sudurpashchim Provincial Assembly (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- First Girija Prasad Koirala cabinet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:House of Representatives constituencies in Koshi Province (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 61 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Subarna Shamsher Rana cabinet (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Category:Nepalese history in popular culture (talk) removed.
July 25, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Pokhara Airport renamed to Pokhara Airport (domestic).
Reassessed
[edit]- Man Mohan Adhikari cabinet (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 2024 Saurya Airlines Bombardier CRJ200 crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- 2024 Saurya Airlines Canadair crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 59 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Panchkoshi Highway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Pokhara Airport (domestic) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Rara Highway (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Grand Hotel Kathmandu (talk) removed.
- Draft:List of ambassadors of Nepal to South Korea (talk) removed.
July 24, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- KP Sharma Oli renamed to K. P. Sharma Oli.
Assessed
[edit]- Category:Denmark–Nepal relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- K. P. Sharma Oli (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Madhesh Province women's cricket team (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Nepalese people of Danish descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Nepal–Thailand relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Thai people of Nepalese descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 23, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Bir Narayan Chaudhary (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Dila (month) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Chet Narayan Acharya (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Mahesh Babu Timalsina (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Nepali Congress symbol (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Usha Bhandari (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Pawan Golyan (talk) removed.
July 22, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of first person to summit Mount Everest by nationality renamed to List of first ascents of Mount Everest by nationality.
Reassessed
[edit]- Prince Dahal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- List of first ascents of Mount Everest by nationality (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Manita Shrestha Pradhan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 52 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- National Highway 53 (Nepal) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Nutan (Nepalese Artist) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:Ujjwal Ghimire (talk) removed.