User:Canozawa/sandbox

Climate change:

The vast majority of the facts are referenced by a credible source. The article manages to remain neutral or appear neutral by providing the facts/evidence in no adamant manner, however the content of the facts are denied by many. There is some uneven representation of the facts. In the internal forcing mechanisms section, when describing the five components of earth's climate system, it describes what the lithosphere is, but not the hydrosphere, cryosphere, or biosphere, as if we're more expected to know what the lithosphere is over the others. I think this article is semi-protected because of the controversial nature of the concept it sells. This is a good thing, because there are many critics who would call this a hoax and tear this article a new one.

Effects of climate change on plant biodiversity:

Virtually all of the facts are referenced by a credible source. I noticed no plagiarism in this article. It does a good job at appearing neutral. Overall, all viewpoints are pretty evenly represented. The higher level changes section is lacking, but I feel that enough information has been provided in previous sections that it still gets it's point across.

Category: Climate Change - Early anthropocene

Not many of the facts are referenced and some of the references aren't properly cited. It is definitely lacking in citations. However, like most articles on Wikipedia, it appears pretty neutral. The viewpoints are pretty evenly represented. The information is fairly up to date. The oldest citation is from 2003.