Jump to content

User:Dizzyturtle/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The biggest challenges a woman in government faces occur during the pursuit of her position in government office, as opposed to when she is upholding said position. Studies show that one of the big challenges is financing for a campaign. Women are more than capable of matching their male opponents in fundraising totals, but evidence shows that men tend to receive more support from party leaders. Therefore, women have to work to build a support system that is not already laid out for them. [1]

According to a survey on a sample of 3,640 elected municipal officeholders, women face adversities with things such as financing a campaign because they are not recruited as much as men by political party leaders. There are two factors that contribute to this trend. The first factor is that party leaders tend to recruit candidates who are similar to them. When survey respondents were asked what candidate appeared the most eligible, they were more likely to choose a candidate who shared the same gender because more similarities were shared. Since there are more men in office in 2018, men are likely to be recruited more so than women because of the similarities that are shared. The same concept applies when discussing the second factor. Recruitment works through networks such as lower level office holders or affiliated businesses. Since women are underrepresented in these networks, according to statistics, they are less likely to be recruited than men. Due to these challenges, women have to spend time obtaining support from party leaders in other ways.

The results of this survey also show that even when women are presented with the opportunity to be recruited, they are still less likely to be interested in obtaining a position in government office. This is due to a woman’s pessimistic view of recruitment as hit or miss opportunity because they are often unintentionally overlooked by current party leaders. Thus, the support they earn after recruitment is not guaranteed.[2]

Annotated Bibliography for work on Women in government[edit]

Daniel Butler, an associate professor of political science at UCSD, conducts research from the Political Research Quarterly as well as a survey given out to 3,640 municipal office holders. The evidence provides a basis as to why women are less likely to seek office even if they are recruited to the same extent as men. Once women are recruited, they have to work on building a support infrastructure from the ground up rather than entering one that is already made for them, which is what men have since they are statistically more open to seeking an office position. I believe this will add support to my paper when I address how a woman's political career is affected once it is started due to gender bias. [2]

Joan Chiao, who is a part of the Department of Psychology at Northwestern University, collaborates with Nicholas Bowman, who is a part of the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience at Northwestern University, along with Harleen Gill, who is a part of the Smith College Neuroscience Program. These scholars conduct research on the psychology behind the gender gap in politics. Their research implies that the gender of both the voter and the candidate affect voting behavior. They also focus on the impact that physical appearance as well as gender has on the political gender gap. This will also be a significant addition to the section of my paper that focuses on a woman's path to a career in politics. [3]

Dawn L. Teele (University of Pennsylvania), Joshua Kalla (University of California, Berkeley), and Frances Rosenbluth (Yale University) examine the correlation between social roles on women's under-representation in politics. They gather evidence through a a population survey of American voters and two rounds of surveys of American public officials. They find no evidence of explicit gender bias. However, when they examine the issue more closely, they find that both elites and voters prefer candidates with a traditional household profile. Since a traditional household profile is contradictory to a woman's political career, this puts women in a double bind. Therefore as long as a political career remains fully demanding, women will remain underrepresented in politics. I think this source will go hand in hand with my second one as there will be some psychology behind this phenomenon. [4]

Kathleen Dolan, from the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, suggests that although there is research which supports that women do not receive more or less votes because of their sex, a woman's votes still depend on the public's attitude about women's representation in government. Therefore, her research is focused on why voters may, or may not, want to see more women represented in government. After conducting an original survey of 1,039 U.S. adults and evaluating both issue and trait stereotypes, she presents her findings as to how gender stereotypes do or do not affect the public's attitude when it comes to voting for a female candidate. This will be an interesting addition to my paper because this provides evidence to stereotypes that others claim do not exist. [5]

Kelly Dittmar, an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University-Camden, directs her research towards gender and American political institutions as well as how gender affects a campaign. In this particular article, she argues that although we are seeing record levels of success for women elites in 2018, women will still only obtain a maximum of 25% of government offices nationwide. She supports her claim by asking 83 congress women about their journey in politics; to which a quarter of them said that the obstacles of getting into congress are far more greater than the ones they face once they have been elected. Dittmar claims that gender bias affects a woman's ability to build a support infrastructure as well as the likelihood of being evaluated correctly by party leaders and voters. This article helps address my question by discussing how a gender bias affects a woman's career path in politics, however I would like to find more research as to what specific gender stereotypes come into play that create this bias. [1]

Yann P. Kerevel, Ph.D., an assistant professor in political science at Louisiana State University, partners with Lonna Rae Atkeson, the Director of the Center for the Study of Voting, Elections and Democracy at the University of New Mexico, to explain the marginalization of women in legislative institutions. The scholars present the research suggesting that once women get into office, they are unable to carry out their job as a legislator due to denied access to important resources. Although some suggest that this marginalization could be due to gender bias, they also propose that this marginalization could be due to incumbency. In order to address this argument, they collect data from the Mexican Chamber of Deputies, an institution without incumbency, in order to examine gender differences in a controlled setting. They find little evidence of marginalization in an institution with no incumbency, but I believe this article will help support my claim in that women face more obstacles before they obtain a position in government office. [6]

Erin C. Cassese, an associate professor of political science at West Virginia University, collaborates with Angela L. Bos, an assistant professor of political science at the College of Wooster, along with Monica C. Schneider, a member of the political science department at Miami University of Ohio, in order to examine the correlation between women being featured in political science textbooks and women who develop an interest in a political science career. They found that the lack of presentation of women in political science textbooks tends to reinforce gender roles as well as the image of women as political outsiders. Thus, the education a woman receives before she has the chance to think of a political science career can sway her decision without her knowing. I think this would be an interesting point to share at the beginning of my addition when I am discussing a woman's path to becoming a politician. [7]

Dr. Carly Speranza, an assistant professor of human resources at Marymount University, analyzes how women expatriate leadership can eliminate gender barriers. After conducting in-depth interviews with senior-level female expatriates from the U.S. government, she uncovers how these women can reduce bias by showing certain leadership behaviors.Thus, demonstrating one of the beneficial outcomes of women being represented in U.S. government. Although this research was done specifically on women expatriates, they are no different than the women who live within our own country. Therefore, this will be interesting support to add when discussing any aspect of a woman's career in U.S. politics and how they can affect generations of female politicians to come. [8]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Dittmar, Kelly (September 21, 2018). "The hardest part of being a woman in Congress? Getting there". Center for American Women and Politics. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  2. ^ a b Butler, Daniel M.; Preece, Jessica Robinson (2016-09-28). "Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support". Political Research Quarterly. 69 (4): 842–851. doi:10.1177/1065912916668412. ISSN 1065-9129. S2CID 157460168.
  3. ^ Chiao, Joan Y.; Bowman, Nicholas E.; Gill, Harleen (2008-10-31). "The Political Gender Gap: Gender Bias in Facial Inferences that Predict Voting Behavior". PLOS ONE. 3 (10): e3666. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003666. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2573960. PMID 18974841.
  4. ^ Teele, Dawn Langan; Kalla, Joshua; Rosenbluth, Frances (August 2018). "The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics". American Political Science Review. 112 (3): 525–541. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000217. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 219889475.
  5. ^ Dolan, Kathleen (2009-05-22). "The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates". Political Behavior. 32 (1): 69–88. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9090-4. ISSN 0190-9320. S2CID 143310106.
  6. ^ Kerevel, Yann P.; Atkeson, Lonna Rae (August 2013). "Explaining the Marginalization of Women in Legislative Institutions". The Journal of Politics. 75 (4): 980–992. doi:10.1017/s0022381613000960. ISSN 0022-3816. S2CID 145814143.
  7. ^ Cassese, Erin C.; Bos, Angela L.; Schneider, Monica C. (December 2004). "SRM Section News". Rangelands. 26 (6): 54–55. doi:10.2111/1551-501x(2004)026.6[0054:ssn]2.0.co;2. ISSN 0190-0528. S2CID 198968961.
  8. ^ Lipkin, M. (2017). "Biology of large bowel cancer. Present status and research frontiers". Cancer. 36 (6 Suppl): 2319–2324. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197512)36:6<2319::aid-cncr2820360606>3.0.co;2-c. ISSN 0008-543X. PMID 2379. S2CID 26804066.

Category:Women in politics Category:Gender studies Category:Women's rights