User:DumbBOT/RfArSummary/Pseudoscience

Summary of Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience/Proposed_decision (experimental)

• Majority: 5
• Total: 8

Color legend

Passed

Rejected

Cannot pass with current votes

Number	Title	Support	Oppose	Abstain	Status
1	Neutral point of view	5	3	0	Passed
1a	Neutral point of view as applied to science	7	0	0	Passed
2	Notability	8	0	0	Passed
3	No original research	1	3	4	Cannot pass with current votes
4	Flexibility in appropriate circumstances	1	4	2	Cannot pass with current votes
5	Wikipedia is not a crystal ball	8	0	0	Passed
6	Wiki process	7	1	0	Passed
7	Experts	4	1	3	Cannot pass with current votes
8	Quality	3	4	1	Cannot pass with current votes
9	Content disputes	7	1	0	Passed
10	Academically demanding subjects	5	0	3	Passed
11	Experts are required to cite sources	7	0	1	Passed
12	Experts are subject to the no original research rule	8	0	0	Passed
13	Conflict of interest	8	0	0	Passed
14	Serious encyclopedias	5	1	2	Passed
15	Obvious pseudoscience	7	1	0	Passed
16	Generally considered pseudoscience	8	0	0	Passed
17	Questionable science	8	0	0	Passed
18	Alternative theoretical formulations	7	1	0	Passed
1	Notability	4	4	0	Cannot pass with current votes
1a	Notability	7	1	0	Passed
2	Locus of dispute	8	0	0	Passed
3	Disputes over expertise	1	7	0	Rejected
4	Some experts have been unable to edit on Wikipedia	2	4	1	Cannot pass with current votes
5	Subjects which require academic expertise	3	0	4	Cannot pass with current votes
6	Disruption of academically demanding subject	1	0	5	Cannot pass with current votes
7	Eric Lerner	8	0	0	Passed
8	Self promotion by Elerner	8	0	0	Passed
9	Pseudoscience	6	0	2	Passed
10	Tommysun	8	0	0	Passed
11	ScienceApologist is uncivil	7	1	0	Passed
11a	Deprecation by ScienceApologist	5	2	0	Passed
12	Iantresman is uncivil	7	1	0	Passed
13	Iantresman's editing style	6	2	0	Passed
14	ScienceApologist has edit warred	7	1	0	Passed
15	Iantresman's orientation	6	0	0	Passed
16	ScienceApologist failure to extend good faith	7	0	0	Passed
17	Category:Fringe subjects without critical scientific evaluation	6	0	0	Passed
1	Designation of subjects requiring academic expertise	1	6	0	Rejected
2	Self designation of academic experts	1	6	0	Rejected
3	Editing of articles designated as requiring academic expertise	1	6	0	Rejected
4	Template:Academic	1	6	0	Rejected
5	Tommysun banned	1	2	2	Cannot pass with current votes
5a	Tommysun banned	7	0	0	Passed
6	Tommysun placed on probation	7	0	0	Passed
7	Elerner banned	8	0	0	Passed
7a	Elerner banned	5	0	2	Passed
8	Iantresman banned	4	4	0	Cannot pass with current votes
8a	Iantresman cautioned	2	3	1	Cannot pass with current votes
8b	Iantresman placed on Probation	8	0	0	Passed
8c	Iantresman banned from policy pages	1	5	1	Rejected
9	ScienceApologist placed on probation	1	7	0	Rejected
10	ScienceApologist cautioned	1	0	0
11	ScienceApologist cautioned	5	0	0	Passed
1	Inappropriate use of Template:Academic	1	6	0	Rejected
2	Use of Template:Academic on inappropriate articles	1	6	0	Rejected
3	Enforcement by block	7	0	0	Passed