User:Eggishorn/sandbox/City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising
< User:Eggishorn | sandbox
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising | |
---|---|
Argued November 28, 1990 Decided April 1, 1991 | |
Full case name | City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. |
Citations | 499 U.S. 365 (more) |
Holding | |
Municipal restrictions on commercial speech are not subject to Sherman Act restraints nor is the Sherman Act applicable to an advertiser's activities seeking actions from city | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Blackmun, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by White, Marshall |
Laws applied | |
Sherman Antitrust Act |
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, 499 U.S. 365 (1991), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving
Prior history[edit]
Decision[edit]
Effects of the decision[edit]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
External links[edit]
- 499 U.S. 365 (1991)—Full text of the opinion
- 891 F. 2d 1127–Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision
Category:United States Supreme Court cases Category:1991 in United States case law Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court